From: Nicolas Brainez Subject: Re: Performance problem Date: 13 May 2002 17:34:24 +0200 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <1021304064.27739.29.camel@nb> References: <1021302616.27660.20.camel@nb> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from 212.68.239.49.brutele.be ([212.68.239.49] helo=many.be) by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 177Hoe-0007PP-00 for ; Mon, 13 May 2002 08:32:48 -0700 To: Trond Myklebust In-Reply-To: Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Mon, 2002-05-13 at 17:17, Trond Myklebust wrote: > >>>>> " " == Nicolas Brainez writes: > > > Hello, I have an nfs server who exports some backup directories > > for the lan's users, it's a new install. > > > First I would like say that's not an hardware problem, because > > we have no problem to use appletalk, ftp, ... > > I'll bet you it is. Have you tried using a different network card + driver? Nope, I've not another network card, and i've absolutely no problem with others protocols like appletalk and ftp, I can't believe it's an hardware problem in these conditions. _______________________________________________________________ Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: bandwidth@sourceforge.net _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs