From: Trond Myklebust Subject: Re: Performance problem Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 08:41:58 +0200 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <200205140841.58623.trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> References: <1021302616.27660.20.camel@nb> <1021304064.27739.29.camel@nb> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from pat.uio.no ([129.240.130.16]) by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 177W0i-0005ar-00 for ; Mon, 13 May 2002 23:42:12 -0700 To: Nicolas Brainez In-Reply-To: <1021304064.27739.29.camel@nb> Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: M=E5ndag 13. mai 2002 17:34 skreiv Nicolas Brainez: > Nope, I've not another network card, and i've absolutely no problem wit= h > others protocols like appletalk and ftp, I can't believe it's an > hardware problem in these conditions. That is completely irrelevant. You are comparing apples and pears: TCP ca= n be=20 made to run reliably over pigeons. NFS uses UDP, and usually presses the=20 cards and drivers to the limit. Cheers, Trond _______________________________________________________________ Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: bandwidth@sourceforge.net _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs