From: Ion Badulescu Subject: Re: Re: NFS retry on disconnection Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 18:52:27 -0400 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <200205142252.g4EMqRL00596@buggy.badula.org> References: Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net, Peter ?strand Return-path: Received: from bgp401130bgs.jersyc01.nj.comcast.net ([68.36.96.125] helo=buggy.badula.org) by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 177l9y-0001Mr-00 for ; Tue, 14 May 2002 15:52:46 -0700 To: Trond Myklebust In-Reply-To: Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On 14 May 2002 10:16:59 +0200, Trond Myklebust wrote: > Nope. Major, minor, it all goes through the same code and both can be > interrupted. What can happen, though, is that one process could > actually be waiting on another process. What I've noticed is that, more often than not, the hanging processes end up waiting for rpciod. Sending a SIGKILL to rpciod unhangs those processes, but unfortunately only root can do that... Ion -- It is better to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool, than to open it and remove all doubt. _______________________________________________________________ Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: bandwidth@sourceforge.net _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs