From: Nicolas Brainez Subject: RE: Performance problem Date: 15 May 2002 10:46:20 +0200 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <1021452381.32242.5.camel@nb> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from 212.68.239.49.brutele.be ([212.68.239.49] helo=many.be) by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 177uOi-00083g-00 for ; Wed, 15 May 2002 01:44:36 -0700 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=localhost.localdomain) by many.be with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 177uOH-0000dG-00 for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 15 May 2002 10:44:09 +0200 To: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: OK, thanks for all your response! I've tried the following: - Change the NIC (old was rtl8139, new is AMD pcnet32): no changes - Mount nfs in local: no problem - Pinging server with 8192 bytes: high packet loss ! (between 30 & 90%) It's maybe no more an nfs problem but, in my LAN the mtu are @ 1500 on every machine, and there's no router between server and workstations, some tips will be appreciated :-). -- Nicolas Brainez _______________________________________________________________ Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: bandwidth@sourceforge.net _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs