From: dumas@centre-cired.fr (Patrice DUMAS - DOCT) Subject: Re: questions about rpc and locks Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 18:41:21 +0200 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <20020502184121.B22985@zeus.centre-cired.fr> References: <20020430174511.A21356@zeus.centre-cired.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from boukha.centre-cired.fr ([193.51.120.234]) by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 173Jio-0004eW-00 for ; Thu, 02 May 2002 09:46:22 -0700 Received: from zeus.centre-cired.fr ([193.51.120.192]) by boukha.centre-cired.fr (8.9.3+Sun/jtpda-5.3.3) with ESMTP id SAA01012 for ; Thu, 2 May 2002 18:45:27 +0100 (WEST) Received: (from dumas@localhost) by zeus.centre-cired.fr (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g42GfLn23938 for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 2 May 2002 18:41:21 +0200 To: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net In-Reply-To: ; from trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no on Wed, May 01, 2002 at 02:14:08PM +0200 Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Hi, Thanks for your reply. > If the call could not be made, then that value will reflect an error > code, usually EINTR (although for 'soft' RPC calls, the error EIO will > be returned if a major timeout occurred). .... > Only makes sense for 'soft' RPC calls, and in that case you get an EIO. In case of an asynchronous call, is there such a difference between 'soft' and 'hard' rpc calls too ? I haven't seen anywhere what was the kind of rpc call of the server side lockd. Is it hard by default ? Pat _______________________________________________________________ Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: bandwidth@sourceforge.net _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs