From: dumas@centre-cired.fr (Patrice DUMAS - DOCT) Subject: 2 feature requests for lockd Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 16:26:43 +0200 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <20020612162643.F10338@hermes.centre-cired.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from boukha.centre-cired.fr ([193.51.120.234]) by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17I98P-00053t-00 for ; Wed, 12 Jun 2002 07:30:05 -0700 Received: from hermes.centre-cired.fr ([193.51.120.92]) by boukha.centre-cired.fr (8.9.3+Sun/jtpda-5.3.3) with ESMTP id QAA04447 for ; Wed, 12 Jun 2002 16:28:30 +0100 (WEST) Received: (from dumas@localhost) by hermes.centre-cired.fr (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g5CEQiE10938 for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 12 Jun 2002 16:26:44 +0200 To: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Hi, I still have 2 requests concerning lockd. Could you please tell me if these features will be accepted, because if not I won't go on to code it, as I don't want to do the patches if they will never be accepted. 1) client side: have a nlm_prog or lockprog as option for mount, which says which rpc program number to use with lockd. 2) server side: Monitor the caller_name instead of the rpc peer. These 2 thinks are needed by sec_rpc (at least I think so) to have lockd tunneling with more than one server, and working statd. Pat _______________________________________________________________ Sponsored by: ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/ _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs