From: Benjamin LaHaise Subject: Re: Tracking rpc errors 'svc: unknown version (0)' Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 11:27:32 -0400 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <20020717112732.A2361@redhat.com> References: <78B78720E680564CB7302950FA6CCF17D302EB@james.fs.apu.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from to-velocet.redhat.com ([216.138.202.10] helo=touchme.toronto.redhat.com) by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17UqiE-0001DY-00 for ; Wed, 17 Jul 2002 08:27:34 -0700 To: Jarod Beekman In-Reply-To: <78B78720E680564CB7302950FA6CCF17D302EB@james.fs.apu.edu>; from JBeekman@apu.edu on Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 07:41:02AM -0700 Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 07:41:02AM -0700, Jarod Beekman wrote: > I upgraded our nfs server from 2.4.9-34 Redhat 7.2 to 2.4.18-5 Redhat > 7.3 and I am now seeing 'svc: unknown version (0)' errors. Poking > around on the list and the net tells me that this is a reflection of an > unrecognized rpc request. Is this correct, and if so is there a way to > track down the source and nature of the request? Thanks for your help. Whoops, that's a patch that got lost between 2.4.9-34 and 2.4.18-5. The message is a null rpc request, and can be safely ignored. -ben -- "You will be reincarnated as a toad; and you will be much happier." ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs