From: "Lever, Charles" Subject: RE: Re: [PATCH] 2.4.19-pre10 RPC changes... Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2002 10:59:29 -0700 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <6440EA1A6AA1D5118C6900902745938E50D06E@black.eng.netapp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from mx01-a.netapp.com ([198.95.226.53]) by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17PRwN-0002hG-00 for ; Tue, 02 Jul 2002 10:59:51 -0700 To: "'Trond Myklebust'" Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: > On Saturday 29 June 2002 20:53, Chuck Lever wrote: > > i'm able to deadlock my dual 1.26GHz P-III with just these > patches applied > > to a naked 2.4.19-pre10 kernel: > > > > linux-2.4.19-00-fix_refresh.dif > > linux-2.4.19-01-fix_kmap1.dif > > linux-2.4.19-02-fix_kmap2.dif > > linux-2.4.19-03-fix_kmap3.dif > > Any chance of finding out which one of the 3 kmap patches is > the one giving trouble? yes. fix_refresh + fix_kmap1 hangs under stress on my system. i can reproduce this with "make -j2 bzImage" in one window and "bonnie" in a loop in another. both cwd's are in the same TCP-mounted NFS file system. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs