From: "H. J. Lu" Subject: Re: Re: Slow performance with 2.4.19pre1 Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2002 16:55:43 -0700 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <20020704165543.A28955@lucon.org> References: <1025814832.2122.14.camel@camp4.serpentine.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jeremy Sanders , nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from sccrmhc03.attbi.com ([204.127.202.63]) by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17QGRz-0007hx-00 for ; Thu, 04 Jul 2002 16:55:51 -0700 To: Bryan O'Sullivan In-Reply-To: <1025814832.2122.14.camel@camp4.serpentine.com>; from bos@serpentine.com on Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 01:33:52PM -0700 Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 01:33:52PM -0700, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote: > On Thu, 2002-07-04 at 08:25, Jeremy Sanders wrote: > > Sorry - I know it's bad form to reply to one's own emails. It seems that > > the stock 2.4.19rc1 kernel doesn't have the problem as a client, and so > > it's the RedHat patched 2.4.18 kernel which is a very slow client. This > > looks like a RedHat bug. >=20 > Yes, you're correct. The kernels Red Hat has been shipping with 7.3 > have atrocious NFS client behaviour, and will bring some servers (such > as Netapp boxes) to a halt. >=20 Have you tried the 7.3 kernel update. It is 2.4.18-5. H.J. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Caffeinated soap. No kidding. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs