From: Yusuf Goolamabbas Subject: Re: Re: Slow performance with 2.4.19pre1 Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 17:48:31 +0800 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <20020705094831.GA26616@outblaze.com> References: <20020704165543.A28955@lucon.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "H. J. Lu" , "Bryan O'Sullivan" , nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from 202-77-223-51.outblaze.com ([202.77.223.51] helo=corpmail.outblaze.com) by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17QPhj-0007AS-00 for ; Fri, 05 Jul 2002 02:48:43 -0700 Received: from yusufg.portal2.com (202-77-223-2.outblaze.com [202.77.223.2]) by corpmail.outblaze.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with SMTP id g659mV28000331 for ; Fri, 5 Jul 2002 09:48:31 GMT To: Jeremy Sanders In-Reply-To: Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: This thread on lkml may provide some insight http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=102519385600004&r=1&w=2 > > Have you tried the 7.3 kernel update. It is 2.4.18-5. > > The tests were with 2.4.18-5 on an athlon. > > Jeremy -- Yusuf Goolamabbas yusufg@outblaze.com ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Bringing you mounds of caffeinated joy. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs