From: "Kedar Sovani" Subject: padding the fh Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2002 11:57:52 +0530 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <003101c250b7$8ad7a220$4f0010ac@Ashwamedha> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_002E_01C250E5.A2917610" Return-path: Received: from silver.he.net ([216.218.151.2]) by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17l1ig-0000yQ-00 for ; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 23:26:54 -0700 Received: from Ashwamedha ([203.124.132.202] (may be forged)) by silver.he.net (8.8.6/8.8.2) with SMTP id XAA10681 for ; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 23:26:47 -0700 To: Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_002E_01C250E5.A2917610 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable hi,=20 I have a problem. Does the linux nfs client follow the rule that = the file handle it recieves is opaque to it(the client).? The problem that i have is, i am sitting at the server, and = trying to pad the file handle being sent back by the exp_rootfh function = in linux kernel 2.4.18-3. When i do sich a thing, i recevie one more = MOUNt request by the client,but this is a MOUNTv2 request. Later, the = client sends the GETATTR, FSTAT & FSINFO commands(this is sent using the = NFsv3 protocol), and sooon later, it sends the same commands with NFSv2. = Can anyone explain this behavior to me. Why might this be = happening. I want to use a padded version of the file handle for the = rest of the server activities. How do i go abt it ? rgds, Kedar. ------=_NextPart_000_002E_01C250E5.A2917610 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

hi,

I = have a=20 problem. Does the linux nfs client follow the rule that the file = handle it=20 recieves is opaque to it(the client).?

= The problem=20 that i have is, i am sitting at the server, and trying to pad the file = handle=20 being sent back by the exp_rootfh function in linux kernel 2.4.18-3. = When i do=20 sich a thing, i recevie one more MOUNt request by the client,but this is = a=20 MOUNTv2 request. Later, the client sends the GETATTR, FSTAT & FSINFO = commands(this is sent using the NFsv3 protocol), and sooon later, it = sends the=20 same commands with NFSv2.

= Can anyone=20 explain this behavior to me. Why might this be happening. I want to use = a padded=20 version of the file handle for the rest of the server activities. How do = i go=20 abt it ?

rgds,

Kedar.

------=_NextPart_000_002E_01C250E5.A2917610-- ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390 _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs