From: "J. Bruce Fields" Subject: Re: Will NFSv4 be accepted? Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 00:07:13 -0400 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <15174.6531170376$1029384852@news.gmane.org> References: <1029375327.28240.35.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Alan Cox , "Kendrick M. Smith" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "nfs@lists.sourceforge.net" , beepy@netapp.com, trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no, torvalds@transmeta.com Return-path: Received: from dsl-65-186-160-165.telocity.com ([65.186.160.165] helo=pumpkin.fieldses.org) by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17fBwv-0002sm-00 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 21:09:29 -0700 To: Dax Kelson In-Reply-To: Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 07:51:56PM -0600, Dax Kelson wrote: > Right, I do understand that Kerberized/GSS NFS is not exclusive to NFSv4. > However, right now, there is only one way to get Kerberized NFS. The CITI > NFSv4 patches. > > Those patches are, in their estimation, ready for inclusion. NFSv3 > support is "coming down the pipeline". The minimal NFSv4 patches which Kendrick has submitted are ready for inclusion, but those do not include rpcsec_gss support. The only patches which include rpcsec_gss support are patches against 2.4.18, and they aren't in good enough shape yet, though we hope they will be soon! --Bruce F. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Dice - The leading online job board for high-tech professionals. Search and apply for tech jobs today! http://seeker.dice.com/seeker.epl?rel_code=31 _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs