From: Alan Cox Subject: Re: Re: Will NFSv4 be accepted? Date: 15 Aug 2002 12:08:27 +0100 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <1029409707.29812.7.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> References: <200208142234.g7EMYvQ21700@tooting-fe.eng> <1029373829.28240.16.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> <20020815061848.GA9122@umich.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: Brian Pawlowski , Trond Myklebust , dax@gurulabs.com, Linus Torvalds , kmsmith@umich.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from pc2-cwma1-5-cust12.swa.cable.ntl.com ([80.5.121.12] helo=irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk) by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17fIWC-0001YY-00 for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 04:10:21 -0700 To: marius@citi.umich.edu In-Reply-To: <20020815061848.GA9122@umich.edu> Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Thu, 2002-08-15 at 07:18, marius aamodt eriksen wrote: > > ACL works in NFSv2 and nicely in NFSv3 - again the problems Linux has > > are the client failing to respect basic NFS rules of operation. > > there is no over-the-wire specification for sending or receving ACLs > on NFSv{2,3} - hence the server may choose to obey them, but an > arbitrary client cannot set them, or view them. If you are trying to argue that NFSv4 handles ACL's better you are preaching to the choir ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390 _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs