From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: High Availability NFS Proposal Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 14:04:16 -0500 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <200208261904.g7QJ4Gd01843@localhost.localdomain> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: James Bottomley , "Bill Rugolsky Jr." , nfs@lists.sourceforge.net, lmb@suse.de Return-path: Received: from host194.steeleye.com ([216.33.1.194] helo=pogo.mtv1.steeleye.com) by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17jPA4-0005Un-00 for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 12:04:28 -0700 Received: (from root@localhost) by pogo.mtv1.steeleye.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id MAA12245 for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 12:04:26 -0700 To: spencer.shepler@sun.com In-Reply-To: Message from Spencer Shepler of "Mon, 26 Aug 2002 12:54:18 CDT." <20020826175418.GB110744@sheplerathome.eng.sun.com> Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: shepler@eng.sun.com said: > How would you propose dealing with NFSv4 where the mount and statd > daemons are not involved with that implementation? Distributions are only just starting to use V3. V4 is so far out as not to need consideration at this time. James ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390 _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs