From: Dax Kelson Subject: Will NFSv4 be accepted? Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 14:49:30 -0600 (MDT) Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "nfs@lists.sourceforge.net" Return-path: Received: from mail.gurulabs.com ([208.177.141.7] ident=you) by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with smtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17f55B-000748-00 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 13:49:33 -0700 To: torvalds@transmeta.com, "Kendrick M. Smith" In-Reply-To: Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Linus, I'm curious if the NFSv4 patches will be accepted in the near future (ie, before 2.6). I for one would REALLY like to see NFSv4 (actually, Kerberized NFSv4 is what I'm after). I just finished setting up a Kerberized Solaris NFS environment with home directories automounted from the clients with strong user authentication. Frankly, the stock (non-Kerberized) NFS security model blows. The fact that any janitor with a laptop (or any client with a malicious root user) can nuke all home directories from a standard NFS home directory server bothers me greatly. Dax Kelson Guru Labs ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Dice - The leading online job board for high-tech professionals. Search and apply for tech jobs today! http://seeker.dice.com/seeker.epl?rel_code=31 _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs