From: Andreas Behnert Subject: Re: Maximum number of nfsd daemons? Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2002 16:03:45 +0200 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <3D4A9141.9050104@gmx.net> References: <15689.54017.692185.573037@notabene.cse.unsw.edu.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Return-path: Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]) by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with smtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17ad1j-0007nW-00 for ; Fri, 02 Aug 2002 07:03:35 -0700 To: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Neil Brown wrote: >>fiona:~# cat /proc/net/rpc/nfsd >>rc 19 123835 15603248 >>fh 10 15227728 0 14 188 >>io 3752095213 1826934055 >>th 128 0 34.710 2.230 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000> >> > This line says [...] > >>ra 256 8316937 462671 10814 6530 3748 4498 2851 3290 1583 1881 402138 >>net 15727611 15727611 0 0 >>rpc 15727102 509 509 0 0 >>proc2 18 856 35104 6 0 9044 349 329927 0 0 83 0 0 0 0 223 0 1890 569 >>proc3 22 144698 1357961 50256 519080 2198920 744533 8887018 60150 5539 710 1 >>0 4486 383 127 0 268983 1005032 88344 6016 4533 2281 > > Everything else looks normal, but you haven't been running this server > for long. Maybe you need a longer period of data collection. [...] It would be great if an explanation of /proc/net/rpc/nfsd could go into the HOWTO ... :) Regards, Andreas ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs