From: Rex Dieter Subject: Re: RH 7.3 kernels and NFS performance Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2002 11:21:04 -0500 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <200208071121.04625.rdieter@math.unl.edu> References: <3D513E56.CAF735B6@lmco.com> <200208071105.35128.rdieter@math.unl.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from mathstat.unl.edu ([129.93.48.14]) by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17cTYa-0005qb-00 for ; Wed, 07 Aug 2002 09:21:08 -0700 To: Trond Myklebust In-Reply-To: Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Wednesday 07 August 2002 11:17 am, Trond Myklebust wrote: > >>>>> " " =3D=3D Rex Dieter writes: > > It depends. I agree that defaulting to 'sync' is not a bug. I > > do *not* agree that 50k writes is not a bug. > > NFSv2 or v3? I tried primarily v3, but I think I remember testing v2 as well, with=20 similar results. -- Rex ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs