From: Neil Brown Subject: Re: Maximum number of nfsd daemons? Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 06:18:29 +1000 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <15697.32917.218601.482586@notabene.cse.unsw.edu.au> References: <15688.47255.83237.874274@notabene.cse.unsw.edu.au> <20020801194339.76fbfb11.philippe.gramoulle@mmania.com> <15696.65206.947132.844146@notabene.cse.unsw.edu.au> <20020807150721.1736ec6f.philippe.gramoulle@mmania.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: nfs Return-path: Received: from tone.orchestra.cse.unsw.edu.au ([129.94.242.28]) by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with smtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17cXFr-0003m9-00 for ; Wed, 07 Aug 2002 13:18:03 -0700 Received: From notabene ([129.94.242.45] == bartok.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU) (for ) (for ) By tone With Smtp ; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 06:17:53 +1000 To: Philippe =?ISO-8859-1?B?R3JhbW91bGzp?= In-Reply-To: message from Philippe Gramoull? on Wednesday August 7 Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Wednesday August 7, philippe.gramoulle@mmania.com wrote: > > > | > | "NFS server not responding" can be due to the receive queue filling up > | on the NFS server. > | while true; do netstat -nta | grep :2049 ; sleep 1; done > > i'm not using TCP right now :o) but will do very soon as i've just build a kernel with all > your patches. > I was actually thinking UDP. The 't' flag was a mistake. If you have working TCP support, then this is all taken care of by the kernel and you don't have to worry about it. NeilBrown ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs