From: Seth Vidal Subject: Re: RH 7.3 kernels and NFS performance Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 01:08:53 -0400 (EDT) Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Trond Myklebust , Return-path: Received: from mail.phy.duke.edu ([152.3.182.2]) by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17cfXd-0001f4-00 for ; Wed, 07 Aug 2002 22:08:57 -0700 To: Rex Dieter In-Reply-To: Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: > > > I tried primarily v3, but I think I remember testing v2 as > > > well, with similar results. > > > > If you are getting that performance with v3, then it does indeed sound > > like a bug somewhere. Try with a stock 2.4.19 kernel instead... > > I just tested things with a test kernel (2.4.18-7) from redhat, and it > sync write speeds were again way up there. Problem fixed, as far as I'm > concerned... hopefully, they'll release an errata soon. look carefully - the only patches in 2.4.18-X (where X >5) are to misc network drivers. 2.4.18-5 with some network cards (specifically eepros and 3c905s) were terribly slow. 2.4.18-5e+ fix it. -sv ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs