From: seth vidal Subject: Re: Journaling FileSystems w/ NFS Date: 20 Sep 2002 12:40:45 -0400 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <1032540045.10301.8.camel@opus> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-cpMY4qeb/uvIYrGx5woA" Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from mail.phy.duke.edu ([152.3.182.2]) by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17sQpm-0004K7-00 for ; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 09:40:50 -0700 To: Greg Boehnlein In-Reply-To: Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: --=-cpMY4qeb/uvIYrGx5woA Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 11:48, Greg Boehnlein wrote: > Hello, > Can someone point me to a FAQ on which is the best solution for > running a Journalized Filesystem with NFS support under Linux? We've trie= d > deploying JFS with RedHat 7.3 and NFS and have run into problems. From my > investigation, it appears that XFS is our best option for running NFS wit= h > +2gig file size support. >=20 ext3 works fine and it works w/o patching your 2.4 kernel. -sv --=-cpMY4qeb/uvIYrGx5woA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQA9i0+N1Aj3x2mIbMcRAvX1AKCSM5RNlWBaGjx/S26XRWaaJzzzowCgjl8A 10ojEhzhF5Uce3mBy0OLAZE= =zzhI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-cpMY4qeb/uvIYrGx5woA-- ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs