From: David Dougall Subject: reduce rsize/wsize or tcp nfs server Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 15:34:30 -0600 (MDT) Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: Received: from postal2.et.byu.edu ([128.187.122.132]) by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17w8BW-0001Ee-00 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 14:34:34 -0700 Received: (from root@localhost) by postal2.et.byu.edu (8.9.3 (PHNE_25184)/8.9.3) id PAA26655 for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 15:35:00 -0600 (MDT) Received: from lewis (lewis.et.byu.edu [128.187.112.50]) by postal2.et.byu.edu (8.9.3 (PHNE_25184)/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA26595 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 15:34:59 -0600 (MDT) To: Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: If I have a mixed network: some 100Mbit, 10Mbit, 1Gbit, etc. Is it wiser to set my wsize/rsize to 1024 to reduce retransmissions or to use tcp protocol for nfs? If I should use tcp, what is needed to get that into the linux nfs server? Is it still very experimental, our could it be trusted in a production environment? Thanks for any help. --David Dougall ______________________________________ Inflex Virus Scanner - installed on mailserver for domain @et.byu.edu Queries to: postmaster@et.byu.edu ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs