From: Tracy R Reed Subject: Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: NFS/2.4.18/reiserfs question Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 22:02:23 -0700 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <20020911220223.B4671@ultraviolet.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/WwmFnJnmDyWGHa4" Cc: NFS at SourceForge , ReiserFS at NameSys Return-path: To: Troy Wu In-Reply-To: ; from troy@sequence.stanford.edu on Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 12:34:23PM -0700 Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: --/WwmFnJnmDyWGHa4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 12:34:23PM -0700, Troy Wu spake thusly: > I've gotten some very helpful information, but am still a little confused. > Basically, I've heard some people say that Reiser (RFS) is simply a bad > choice with NFS. Others have said I'm using the wrong version of the > on-disk format. I've also been reading up on the discussion at the > ReiserFS archives about this. http://www.namesys.com/faq.html#nfs --=20 Tracy Reed http://www.ultraviolet.org "Our products just aren't engineered for security." - Brian Valentine, senior VP in charge of Microsoft's Windows development 5 Sept 2002 --/WwmFnJnmDyWGHa4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAj2AH98ACgkQ9PIYKZYVAq3SCgCbB7qN+nVdG39ALUQ/8B1b3CBU bdEAoISOp5cPBfvBciSHWCgYUCRcZOQr =Znq/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/WwmFnJnmDyWGHa4-- ------------------------------------------------------- In remembrance www.osdn.com/911/ _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs