From: Chip Salzenberg Subject: Must statd be running before nfs client makes mounts? Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2002 18:52:26 -0400 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <20020915225226.GI11002@perlsupport.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from tandu.perlsupport.com ([66.220.6.226] ident=mail) by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17qiGP-0006UK-00 for ; Sun, 15 Sep 2002 15:53:13 -0700 Received: from 0-1pool60-22.nas41.philadelphia1.pa.us.da.qwest.net ([65.129.60.22] helo=tytlal ident=mail) by tandu.perlsupport.com with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17qiGO-0005wF-00 for ; Sun, 15 Sep 2002 15:53:12 -0700 Received: from chip by tytlal with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17qiFe-0007Yx-00 for ; Sun, 15 Sep 2002 18:52:26 -0400 To: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: I've just noticed that Debian mounts NFS filesystems from /etc/fstab before statd starts. Is this OK? (And I wonder at how it's going to try to do NFS client mounts before bind is even started, but I guess that's a separate issue... :-)) -- Chip Salzenberg - a.k.a. - "It furthers one to have somewhere to go." ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs