From: Jean-Eric Cuendet <Jean-Eric.Cuendet@linkvest.com>
Subject: rpc.mountd + rpc.nfsd
Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2002 15:12:07 +0200
Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
Message-ID: <3D7363A7.8090906@linkvest.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Return-path: <nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net>
To: nfs@sourceforge.net
Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
List-Help: <mailto:nfs-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:nfs@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs>,
	<mailto:nfs-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development,
	interoperability,
	and testing. <nfs.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs>,
	<mailto:nfs-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=nfs>

Hi,
Why is there 2 daemons for NFS progs? Is it a necessity or just to
separate things?
Would it be possible to have only one nfsd daemon that is rpc.mounts +
rpc.nfsd + ... ?

Thanks.
-jec




-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone?  Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist  -  NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs