From: Trond Myklebust Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] zerocopy NFS for 2.5.43 Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 01:55:26 +0200 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <15799.14062.275890.83768@charged.uio.no> References: <15786.23306.84580.323313@notabene.cse.unsw.edu.au> <20021018.221103.35656279.taka@valinux.co.jp> <15797.63730.223181.75888@notabene.cse.unsw.edu.au> <20021024.065015.74750854.taka@valinux.co.jp> Reply-To: trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au, nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from pat.uio.no ([129.240.130.16]) by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 184VLi-0000hh-00 for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 16:55:42 -0700 To: Hirokazu Takahashi In-Reply-To: <20021024.065015.74750854.taka@valinux.co.jp> Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: >>>>> " " == Hirokazu Takahashi writes: > I was thinking about the nfs clients. Why don't we make > xprt_sendmsg() use the sendpage interface instead of calling > sock_sendmsg() so that we can avoid dead-lock which multiple > kmap()s in xprt_sendmsg() might cause on heavily loaded > machines. I'm definitely in favour of such a change. Particularly so if the UDP interface is ready. Cheers, Trond ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0002en _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs