From: Hirokazu Takahashi Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] zerocopy NFS for 2.5.43 Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 10:33:49 +0900 (JST) Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <20021024.103349.26272209.taka@valinux.co.jp> References: <15797.63730.223181.75888@notabene.cse.unsw.edu.au> <20021024.065015.74750854.taka@valinux.co.jp> <15799.14062.275890.83768@charged.uio.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au, nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from sv1.valinux.co.jp ([202.221.173.100]) by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 184Wzr-00079M-00 for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 18:41:15 -0700 To: trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no In-Reply-To: <15799.14062.275890.83768@charged.uio.no> Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Hello, > > I was thinking about the nfs clients. Why don't we make > > xprt_sendmsg() use the sendpage interface instead of calling > > sock_sendmsg() so that we can avoid dead-lock which multiple > > kmap()s in xprt_sendmsg() might cause on heavily loaded > > machines. > > I'm definitely in favour of such a change. Particularly so if the UDP > interface is ready. I've implemented it and we can find it in linux-2.5.44. The interface is the same as the TCP's one. Thank you, Hirokazu Takahashi. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0002en _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs