From: Hirokazu Takahashi Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] zerocopy NFS for 2.5.43 Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 08:39:58 +0900 (JST) Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <20021029.083958.74744748.taka@valinux.co.jp> References: <20021024.103349.26272209.taka@valinux.co.jp> <20021027.193917.78705070.taka@valinux.co.jp> <15805.26221.530836.279218@charged.uio.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au, nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from sv1.valinux.co.jp ([202.221.173.100]) by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 186Jby-00050s-00 for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 15:47:58 -0800 To: trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no In-Reply-To: <15805.26221.530836.279218@charged.uio.no> Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Hello, > - RFC1832 states that *all* variable length data must be padded with > zeros, and that is certainly not the case if the pages you are > pointing to are in the page cache. Yes, your're right. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs