From: kaza@kk.iij4u.or.jp Subject: Re: [PATCH] zerocopy NFS for 2.5.36 Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 02:02:15 +0900 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20021016170213.GR19806%kaza@kk.iij4u.or.jp> References: <15786.23306.84580.323313@notabene.cse.unsw.edu.au> <20021014.210144.74732842.taka@valinux.co.jp> <15788.57476.858253.961941@notabene.cse.unsw.edu.au> <20021016.200900.128068491.taka@valinux.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au, davem@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: To: Hirokazu Takahashi In-Reply-To: <20021016.200900.128068491.taka@valinux.co.jp> List-ID: Hello, On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 08:09:00PM +0900, Hirokazu Takahashi-san wrote: > > After thinking about this some more, I suspect it would have to be > > quite large scale SMP to get much contention. > > I have no idea how much contention will happen. I haven't checked the > performance of it on large scale SMP yet as I don't have such a great > machines. > > Does anyone help us? Why don't you propose the performance test to OSDL? (OSDL-J is more better, I think) OSDL provide hardware resources and operation staffs. If you want, I can help you to propose it. :-) -- Ko Kazaana / editor-in-chief of "TechStyle" ( http://techstyle.jp/ ) GnuPG Fingerprint = 1A50 B204 46BD EE22 2E8C 903F F2EB CEA7 4BCF 808F