From: <rddunlap@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] zerocopy NFS for 2.5.36
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 21:36:32 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0210162135380.29590-100000@osdlab.pdx.osdl.net>
References: <20021016170213.GR19806%kaza@kk.iij4u.or.jp>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: Hirokazu Takahashi <taka@valinux.co.jp>, <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au>,
	<davem@redhat.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<nfs@lists.sourceforge.net>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner+linux-kernel=40quimby.gnus.org@vger.kernel.org>
To: <kaza@kk.iij4u.or.jp>
In-Reply-To: <20021016170213.GR19806%kaza@kk.iij4u.or.jp>
List-ID: <nfs.lists.sourceforge.net>

On Thu, 17 Oct 2002 kaza@kk.iij4u.or.jp wrote:

| Hello,
|
| On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 08:09:00PM +0900,
| Hirokazu Takahashi-san wrote:
| > > After thinking about this some more, I suspect it would have to be
| > > quite large scale SMP to get much contention.
| >
| > I have no idea how much contention will happen. I haven't checked the
| > performance of it on large scale SMP yet as I don't have such a great
| > machines.
| >
| > Does anyone help us?
|
| Why don't you propose the performance test to OSDL? (OSDL-J is more
| better, I think)   OSDL provide hardware resources and operation staffs.

and why do you say that?  8;)

| If you want, I can help you to propose it. :-)

That's the right thing to do.

-- 
~Randy