From: Scott McDermott Subject: Re: a NFS problem Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 13:54:19 -0400 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <20021010135419.W5483@questra.com> References: <200210092038.QAA47299@protein3d.ncifcrf.gov> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from ns1.questra.com ([64.132.48.186] helo=questra.com) by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with smtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17zhVv-0001KU-00 for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2002 10:54:23 -0700 Received: (from mcdermot@localhost) by odio.roc.questra.com (8.11.6/8.11.4) id g9AHsJr13607 for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 10 Oct 2002 13:54:19 -0400 To: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net In-Reply-To: <200210092038.QAA47299@protein3d.ncifcrf.gov>; from tsai@protein3d.ncifcrf.gov on Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 04:38:41PM -0400 Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Chung-Jung Tsai on Wed 9/10 16:38 -0400: > Files written by a f90 program running at master node were not updated > for the other nodes to see their content correctly. It seems like a > sync problem. I believe the sync consistency threshold is one second. Subsecond coherency cannot be acheived, IIRC. Check the list archives for more information. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs