From: Trond Myklebust Subject: Re: 2.4.19 NFSALL performance oddity Date: 05 Oct 2002 01:46:13 +0200 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: References: <5CA6F03EF05E0046AC5594562398B91653B9C0@poexmb3.conoco.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Return-path: Received: from mons.uio.no ([129.240.130.14]) by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17xc9I-0006L3-00 for ; Fri, 04 Oct 2002 16:46:24 -0700 To: "Heflin, Roger A." In-Reply-To: <5CA6F03EF05E0046AC5594562398B91653B9C0@poexmb3.conoco.net> Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: >>>>> " " == Roger A Heflin writes: > I have noticed that the IO rates (writes) start slowly (about > 1.5MB/second) and slowly build up to a peak of 2.5MB/second > over several minutes, with the test averaging 2.32 MB/second > over a 2GB file write. This is with a server with Gigabit > copper and the client with 100BT ethernet. No packets are > being lost from what I can tell, on either the server or the > client, both machines are dual cpu with 2GB of ram and > otherwise unloaded. Have you enabled CONFIG_HIGHMEM? If so, could you please try disabling it. Cheers, Trond ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs