From: Bryan O'Sullivan Subject: Re: 2.4.19 NFSALL performance oddity Date: 04 Oct 2002 21:48:30 -0700 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <1033793310.4626.0.camel@camp4.serpentine.com> References: <5CA6F03EF05E0046AC5594562398B91653B9C0@poexmb3.conoco.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: "Heflin, Roger A." , nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from dsl092-013-071.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.92.13.71] helo=pelerin.serpentine.com) by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17xgrg-0001KH-00 for ; Fri, 04 Oct 2002 21:48:32 -0700 To: Trond Myklebust In-Reply-To: Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Fri, 2002-10-04 at 16:46, Trond Myklebust wrote: > Have you enabled CONFIG_HIGHMEM? If so, could you please try disabling > it. What's the issue with CONFIG_HIGHMEM, and on which machine should it be expected to make a difference?