From: Trond Myklebust Subject: Re: 2.4.19 NFSALL performance oddity Date: 05 Oct 2002 18:18:06 +0200 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: References: <5CA6F03EF05E0046AC5594562398B91653B9C0@poexmb3.conoco.net> <1033793310.4626.0.camel@camp4.serpentine.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "Heflin, Roger A." , nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from mons.uio.no ([129.240.130.14]) by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17xrdE-0004Hy-00 for ; Sat, 05 Oct 2002 09:18:20 -0700 To: Bryan O'Sullivan In-Reply-To: <1033793310.4626.0.camel@camp4.serpentine.com> Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: >>>>> " " == Bryan O'Sullivan writes: > On Fri, 2002-10-04 at 16:46, Trond Myklebust wrote: >> Have you enabled CONFIG_HIGHMEM? If so, could you please try >> disabling it. > What's the issue with CONFIG_HIGHMEM, and on which machine > should it be expected to make a difference? I'm seeing major slowdowns, mainly on NFS reads, when I enable CONFIG_HIGHMEM. I haven't yet had time to investigate this. Cheers, Trond ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs