From: Trond Myklebust Subject: Re: 2.4.19 NFSALL performance oddity Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2002 23:51:29 +0200 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <15775.24289.796995.465654@charged.uio.no> References: <5CA6F03EF05E0046AC5594562398B91653B9C0@poexmb3.conoco.net> <1033793310.4626.0.camel@camp4.serpentine.com> <1033851316.29937.37.camel@plokta.s8.com> Reply-To: trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "Heflin, Roger A." , nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from pat.uio.no ([129.240.130.16]) by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17xwpl-0006rR-00 for ; Sat, 05 Oct 2002 14:51:37 -0700 To: Bryan O'Sullivan In-Reply-To: <1033851316.29937.37.camel@plokta.s8.com> Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: >>>>> " " == Bryan O'Sullivan writes: > I'll try to take a look on a local system in the next few days. > Are you or Roger using Jens Axboe's block-highmem patch or any > of the drivers it touches? Knowing this should help control > for at least one variable. I've seen the behaviour on stock 2.4.19 and 2.4.20-preX. I haven't tested any of Jens' patches... Cheers, Trond ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs