From: Trond Myklebust Subject: Re: [Ext2-devel] Re: [NFS] htree+NFS (NFS client bug?) Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 03:46:00 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <15845.33640.256556.123111@charged.uio.no> References: <1038354285.1302.144.camel@sherkaner.pao.digeo.com> <1038387522.31021.188.camel@ixodes.goop.org> <20021127150053.A2948@redhat.com> <1038449223.1464.17.camel@ixodes.goop.org> Reply-To: trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "Stephen C. Tweedie" , Ext2 devel , NFS maillist , Linux Kernel List Return-path: To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge In-Reply-To: <1038449223.1464.17.camel@ixodes.goop.org> List-ID: >>>>> " " == Jeremy Fitzhardinge writes: > Hm, I just did a run with 8k NFS packets, and the results are > slightly different. There's only a single READDIR reply, > fragmented over 3 IP packets. vg_include.h~51-kill-inceip > still has a cookie of 1611747420, and vg_libpthread.vs is still > the last entry returned, but it has a cookie of 0. As far as I > can see, all the other cookies are unique. AFAICS, the ext2/ext3 code is simply failing to initialize that last cookie, and so knfsd is giving it the value of the cookie that was passed by the client. Cheers, Trond