From: Trond Myklebust Subject: Re: 2.4.20-rc1 NFS/TCP client (still) hangs running dbench 2.0 Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 22:58:36 +0100 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <15810.63756.640223.676492@charged.uio.no> References: <3DC2E7B6.6090400@collab.net> <0211011318080N.01583@stinkpad060501> Reply-To: trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from mons.uio.no ([129.240.130.14]) by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 187joY-00011b-00 for ; Fri, 01 Nov 2002 13:58:50 -0800 To: Andrew Ryan In-Reply-To: <0211011318080N.01583@stinkpad060501> Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: >>>>> " " == Andrew Ryan writes: > However, according to nfsstat -c's "Client rpc stats", I'm > getting around a 10:1 ratio of retransmits to calls. That's > bad. I get 0 retransmits when using 2.4.19+kmap1, and any > previous kernel I've ever tried TCP mounting with. I checked > 2.4.20rc1-vanilla and it does the same thing, so it's not the > latest patch. It is probably just the (known) accounting error in the 'retransmit' statistics. Try applying the patch http://www.fys.uio.no/~trondmy/src/2.4.20-pre9/linux-2.4.20-01-call_start.dif if it bothers you. Note: the TCP timeout + retransmits will (unlike UDP) be of the order of 60 seconds, so if these were real retransmits, you'd be seeing a *very* noticeable slowdown... Cheers, Trond ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm Tungsten T handheld. Power & Color in a compact size! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0001en _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs