From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ragnar_Kj=F8rstad?= Subject: Re: nfs performance problem Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 20:17:59 +0100 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <20021105201758.I23227@vestdata.no> References: <005b01c284f5$ae1d6090$640a010a@winda> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from stine.vestdata.no ([195.204.68.10]) by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 1899DH-0005kG-00 for ; Tue, 05 Nov 2002 11:18:12 -0800 To: "poczta.dotcom.pl" In-Reply-To: <005b01c284f5$ae1d6090$640a010a@winda>; from myciel@dotcom.pl on Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 07:03:43PM +0100 Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 07:03:43PM +0100, poczta.dotcom.pl wrote: > Hi All >=20 > I have really slow working nfs. > Server is build on: > - dual pentium Xeon 2GHz, > - 2 3ware 7500 controllers, > - raid 5 on 7 160GB discs on controler 1=20 > - raid 5 on 6 160GB disks on cotroller 2=20 >=20 > Serwer is used for ~500k maildirs,=20 > all clients (~20) are freebsd boxes, when nfs transfer is around 1MB/s = for writing and 1.5MB/s for reading=20 > listing user directories even with very few file stakes up to 15 second= s. >=20 > I tried nfs-ALL patch, but it didn' t help. How is local performance? What filesystem do you use? What's the output from "iostat -x -d -k 60 3"? --=20 Ragnar Kj=F8rstad Big Storage ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm Tungsten T handheld. Power & Color in a compact size! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0001en _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs