From: "Jake Hammer" Subject: RE: NFS read ok, write ok, simultaneous R+W=TERRIBLE Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 11:47:19 -0800 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: References: <20021205192917.GA16871@hpti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: "NFS" Return-path: Received: from cynaptic.com ([128.121.116.181]) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 18K1y7-0004mf-00 for ; Thu, 05 Dec 2002 11:47:31 -0800 To: "Craig Tierney" In-Reply-To: <20021205192917.GA16871@hpti.com> Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: > Are you reading and writing the files at the same time? Or are > you reading > older files, while writing newer files? 20 clients all write a unique 10GB file (20 x 10GB files), then 20 clients all read the unique 10GB file written previously (20 x 10GB files), then 20 clients all read and write new unique 10GB files *simultaneously* (20 x 10GB files read + 20 x 10GB files written - 40 total) Note that the files being read are the same files from the first write in step 1. > So the second test is > still 20 clients, > but each client is doing a read and write (to different files)? Correct - as above. Thanks, Jake ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs