From: Sven Geggus Subject: Re: Performance tuning of diskless clients Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 16:29:24 +0000 (UTC) Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: References: Return-path: Received: from benzin.geggus.net ([213.146.112.23] ident=foobar) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 18ee39-0001uz-00 for ; Fri, 31 Jan 2003 08:29:55 -0800 Received: from news by benzin.geggus.net with local (Exchange M$) id 18ee2e-00072n-00 for ; Fri, 31 Jan 2003 17:29:24 +0100 To: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Sven Geggus wrote: > At the Moment Server and client are both running vanilla Kernel 2.4.20 on > Debian woody. Obviously this Information was not enough, as somebody told me by private Mail. I already tried tuning the /proc/sys/net/core/*mem_* setting and rsize/wsize Values which does not seem to have an influence of the slow Startup times of Bigger Applications. I didn't try to set this sizes bigger than 8192 though, because this is not possible without patching the Kernel. BTW, my question is also aboutv possible Kernel-patches I should probably use. Sven -- "And I'm right. I'm always right, but in this case I'm just a bit more right than I usually am." (Linus Torvalds, Sunday Aug 27, 2000) /me is giggls@ircnet, http://sven.gegg.us/ on the Web ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs