From: "Lever, Charles" Subject: RE: Re: broken umount -f Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 11:36:29 -0800 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <6440EA1A6AA1D5118C6900902745938E07D551EB@black.eng.netapp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from mx01.netapp.com ([198.95.226.53]) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 18YWrX-00049j-00 for ; Tue, 14 Jan 2003 11:36:39 -0800 To: "'Scott Mcdermott'" Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: > -----Original Message----- > From: Scott Mcdermott [mailto:smcdermott@questra.com] > Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 2:20 PM > To: Trond Myklebust > Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [NFS] Re: broken umount -f > > Last I checked, the programs wouldn't die even with -KILL > when they were > stuck in device-wait state. The only way to reboot a machine > with such > processes is to reboot -f, which is wrong. The filesystems should be > able to have forced umount at sysadmin's discretion. do you remember which kernel this was? trond fixed a long-standing "processes stuck in 'D' state" bug in 2.4.20. this bug may be the reason these processes didn't die when you killed them. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Take your first step towards giving your online business a competitive advantage. Test-drive a Thawte SSL certificate - our easy online guide will show you how. Click here to get started: http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0027en _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs