From: Benjamin LaHaise Subject: Re: Re: broken umount -f Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 14:39:14 -0500 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <20030114143914.C15824@redhat.com> References: <6440EA1A6AA1D5118C6900902745938E07D551E8@black.eng.netapp.com> <20030114170755.GA18952@questra.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Scott Mcdermott , nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from to-velocet.redhat.com ([216.138.202.10] helo=touchme.toronto.redhat.com) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 18YWu9-0004ud-00 for ; Tue, 14 Jan 2003 11:39:21 -0800 To: Trond Myklebust In-Reply-To: ; from trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no on Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 08:06:09PM +0100 Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 08:06:09PM +0100, Trond Myklebust wrote: > Linux will not allow you to unmount without killing those processes, > and I'd be opposed to any patch that tries to kill active processes > from within the filesystem. > This is something that needs to be resolved in userland. It's up to NFS to make the outstanding IOs against the filesystem return -EIO. -ben ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Take your first step towards giving your online business a competitive advantage. Test-drive a Thawte SSL certificate - our easy online guide will show you how. Click here to get started: http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0027en _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs