From: "Cole, Timothy D." Subject: RE: Re: broken umount -f Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 11:49:55 -0800 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <7F21D7A9E7D9D51192CB0002A53F93C73C28E6@xcgmd024.md.essd.northgrum.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from xcgtx811.northgrum.com ([208.20.220.57]) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 18YX9g-0008QO-00 for ; Tue, 14 Jan 2003 11:55:24 -0800 To: "'trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no'" Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: > -----Original Message----- > From: Trond Myklebust [mailto:trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no] > Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 14:36 > To: Scott Mcdermott > Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [NFS] Re: broken umount -f > > They will if you mount with 'intr', and make sure that you kill *all* > programs that are using that mountpoint. That doesn't always appear to be the case in practice (maybe a long-standing bug/strange interaction?). Can there be users not reported by fuser? ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Take your first step towards giving your online business a competitive advantage. Test-drive a Thawte SSL certificate - our easy online guide will show you how. Click here to get started: http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0027en _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs