From: Danny Smith Subject: Re: Adapter teaming Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2003 17:20:16 +0000 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <3E19BAD0.6060207@cinesite.co.uk> References: <17110141.1041869610713.JavaMail.www-data@moksha.oddpost.com> <3E19B71F.6060905@emageon.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Cc: Joseph Marshall , nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from scanman.cinesite.co.uk ([193.203.81.129]) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 18Vavl-0005en-00 for ; Mon, 06 Jan 2003 09:20:54 -0800 To: Brian Tinsley Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: I've seen similar results when the teaming is misconfigured on the switch, and hence losing packets (half of them in my case). A quick ping should show that up fairly quickly. Generally the bonding code works well for us. Brian Tinsley wrote: > Yes, we use both the Intel driver (iANS) and the stock bonding driver > on our NFS servers and have had no problems. More specifics on your > configuration would help. > > > Joseph Marshall wrote: > >> Has anyone had any success using NFS on a server that is also doing >> Adapter teaming? For some reason when if I have adapter teaming >> set-up and an NFS share mounted my entire server will "lock-up". If >> I turn adpater teaming off, the NFS mount works fine. Any insight >> would be greatly appreciated. >> Joe > -- Danny Smith Senior Systems Administrator, Cinesite (Europe) Ltd 020 7973 4000 - x4055 / dannys@cinesite.co.uk ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs