From: Paul Heinlein Subject: Re: RedHat/Mandrake NFS - not playing nice Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 14:28:55 -0800 (PST) Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: References: <3E515C6E.6040609@mleads.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from franklin.cse.ogi.edu ([129.95.40.7]) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 18ktl0-0008E6-00 for ; Mon, 17 Feb 2003 14:29:02 -0800 To: Santiago In-Reply-To: <3E515C6E.6040609@mleads.com> Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, Santiago wrote: > However, I still am receiving the same error as before: > [root@backup linux]# mount 10.0.0.48:/var/www/html /r/amanda/nitro-html > -t nfs > mount: 10.0.0.48:/var/www/html failed, reason given by server: > Permission denied I hate to ask the obvious questions, but * Is there anything in /etc/host.deny that would keep your client from getting to the server? * Is there any sort of ipchains/iptables packet filtering that would keep your client from getting to the server? * Do the logs on the server offer any clues as to why it doesn't like your client's mount requests? --Paul Heinlein ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs