From: "Wendy Cheng" Subject: NFS Read Performance Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2003 11:26:31 -0500 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <002301c2f08f$cd30c430$19103942@tamarac> Reply-To: "Wendy Cheng" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Return-path: Received: from [66.105.142.2] (helo=falconstorex.falconstor.com) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 18wlpM-0003Qa-00 for ; Sat, 22 Mar 2003 08:26:37 -0800 To: Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: we're conducting SPEC SFS97 benchmark runs to evaluate Linux performance as NFS file servers. It is observed that an unusual high percentage of benchmark time was spent in "read" operation. A sampled workload consisting of 18% of read consumes 63% of total benchmark time. Did this problem get analyzed before (or even better :)- is there a patch) ? We're on 2.4.19 kernel- NFS V3 - UDP, with EXT3 as local file system. Thanks in advance. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open! Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and the chance of winning an Apple iPod: http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs