From: Trond Myklebust Subject: Re: RedHat 8.0 nfs Date: 26 Mar 2003 00:19:18 +0100 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "pwitting@Cyveillance.com" , "nfs@lists.sourceforge.net" Return-path: Received: from mons.uio.no ([129.240.130.14] ident=7411) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 18xxhc-0005nt-00 for ; Tue, 25 Mar 2003 15:19:33 -0800 To: David Dougall In-Reply-To: Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: >>>>> " " == David Dougall writes: > This doesn't agree with what I have heard before. I was always > told that this memory amount( 256k default) was shared by all > threads. Therefore the more threads you had, the more You were misinformed. In Linux 2.4.x, each RPC server thread allocates a private buffer. Cheers, Trond ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: The Definitive IT and Networking Event. Be There! NetWorld+Interop Las Vegas 2003 -- Register today! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?keyn0001en _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs