From: Trond Myklebust Subject: RE: linux 2.4.20 oops Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 19:04:49 +0200 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <16046.45233.640294.228310@charged.uio.no> References: <6440EA1A6AA1D5118C6900902745938E07D55598@black.eng.netapp.com> Reply-To: trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from pat.uio.no ([129.240.130.16]) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 19AYXI-0001ij-00 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 10:04:56 -0700 To: "Lever, Charles" In-Reply-To: <6440EA1A6AA1D5118C6900902745938E07D55598@black.eng.netapp.com> Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: >>>>> " " == Charles Lever writes: > the fix appears in 2.4.21-pre7, but was removed from > 2.4.21-rc1. trond? Huh? From the latest BK pull linux/net/sunrpc/sched.c /* * Delete any timer for the current task. Because we use del_timer_sync(), * this function should never be called while holding rpc_queue_lock. */ static inline void rpc_delete_timer(struct rpc_task *task) { dprintk("RPC: %4d deleting timer\n", task->tk_pid); del_timer_sync(&task->tk_timer); } So AFAICS it is still there. I certainly have no quarrel with that patch. I hit upon the same problem + fix in a different bug-report at ~ the same time. Cheers, Trond ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs