From: "Lever, Charles" Subject: RE: linux 2.4.20 oops Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 10:24:04 -0700 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <6440EA1A6AA1D5118C6900902745938E07D5559C@black.eng.netapp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Cc: "NFS maillist" Return-path: Received: from mx01.netapp.com ([198.95.226.53]) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 19AYqn-00005F-00 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 10:25:05 -0700 To: , "Marcelo Tosatti" Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: i will verify that i have created 2.4.21-rc1 correctly. > -----Original Message----- > From: Trond Myklebust [mailto:trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no] > Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2003 1:22 PM > To: Marcelo Tosatti > Cc: Lever, Charles; NFS maillist > Subject: RE: [NFS] linux 2.4.20 oops >=20 >=20 > >>>>> " " =3D=3D Charles Lever writes: >=20 > > i built 2.4.21-rc1 from 2.4.20.tar.bz2 and the rc1 upgrade > > patch, and its not in my version of rc1. >=20 > Hmmm... strange. AFAICS there are no NFS or RPC changes whatsoever in > the rc1 patch on ftp.kernel.org. > As I said, all the changes (including Ulrich Weigand's patch) appear > to still be in the bitkeeper repository (see for instance the kernel > source browser on http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.4). >=20 > Marcelo, is this perhaps a problem with an incorrect generation of the > 'official' 2.4.21-rc1 patch? >=20 > Cheers, > Trond >=20 ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs