From: "Lever, Charles" Subject: RE: max number of NFS mounts Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2003 06:28:38 -0700 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <6440EA1A6AA1D5118C6900902745938E07D554CA@black.eng.netapp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Cc: Return-path: Received: from mx01.netapp.com ([198.95.226.53]) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 192t9n-0004Zr-00 for ; Tue, 08 Apr 2003 06:28:59 -0700 To: "Robin Humble" Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: hi robin- > We have a large linux cluster with 256 backend nodes, 10 development > nodes, plus a few other mounts/machines of various sorts. >=20 > When using autofs in an attempt to mount all backend disks at once we > hit the 256 mounts limitation and only get to about 246 backend disks > mounted - this is a pain :-/ >=20 > so yes, your message (that I eventually found via Neil Brown) was most > helpful and please add it to the FAQ and also into=20 > linux/Documentation/* > somewhere. > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=3D4215392 a new FAQ is planned to address this issue. thanks for the suggestion! ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs