From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
Subject: Re: (no subject)
Date: 23 Apr 2003 21:20:21 +0200
Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
Message-ID: <shsr87tqave.fsf@charged.uio.no>
References: <20030423183859.28233.qmail@web41304.mail.yahoo.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net,  charles.lever@netapp.com
Return-path: <nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net>
Received: from pat.uio.no ([129.240.130.16])
	by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian))
	id 198PnA-00015P-00
	for <nfs@lists.sourceforge.net>; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 12:20:28 -0700
To: greg@bakers.org
In-Reply-To: <20030423183859.28233.qmail@web41304.mail.yahoo.com>
Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
List-Help: <mailto:nfs-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:nfs@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs>,
	<mailto:nfs-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development,
	interoperability,
	and testing. <nfs.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs>,
	<mailto:nfs-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=nfs>

>>>>> " " == bakerg3  <gb> writes:

     > Until this critical problem is resolved, it is a moot point to
     > argue the advantages of tcp-nfs vs. udp-nfs regarding network
     > traffic or CPU usage.

That one data point should imply such a drastic conclusion...

...and not a single tcpdump to demonstrate the problem. Sigh...

Cheers,
  Trond


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist  -  NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs